Congestion pricing is a surcharge system applied to public goods experiencing high demand, such as roads, public transport, electricity, and communication networks. By increasing prices during peak hours, it aims to reduce congestion and manage demand without necessarily expanding the existing infrastructure. Examples include higher fees for bus services during rush hour, peak electricity rates, and road pricing to alleviate traffic. This strategy is also used for airlines and shipping companies, with higher fees for airport slots and canal usage during busy periods.
In 1952, Nobel laureate William Vickrey proposed adding a distance- or time-based fare system for the New York City Subway.
In 1964, the Smeed Report, published by the British Ministry of Transport, considered congestion pricing but its recommendations were rejected by successive British governments.
In 1968, the first congestion pricing scheme was started with higher landing fees for peak-hour use by aircraft with 25 seats or fewer at Newark, Kennedy, and LaGuardia airports in New York City.
In 1972, the British Airports Authority (BAA) implemented the first peak pricing policy, with surcharges varying depending on the season and time of the day.
In 1975, Singapore became the first country to introduce congestion pricing on its urban roads.
In 1975, the first implementation of a congestion pricing scheme was the Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, along with other measures and improvements in mass transit.
By 1976, the British Airports Authority (BAA) raised these peak charges.
Between 1983 and 1985, Hong Kong conducted a pilot test on an electronic congestion pricing system with positive results.
London-Heathrow had seven pricing structures between 1976 and 1984.
Between 1983 and 1985, Hong Kong conducted a pilot test on an electronic congestion pricing system with positive results.
In 1986, Bergen became the first city in Norway to introduce tolled entrances to the more central urban areas.
In 1986, Bergen pioneered the implementation of electronic urban tolling in the main corridors.
In 1988 a higher landing fee for smaller aircraft at Boston's Logan Airport was adopted; with this measure much of the general aviation abandoned Logan for secondary airports.
In 1988, the US carriers won their case in international arbitration against the British Airports Authority (BAA).
In 1990, Oslo implemented electronic urban tolling in the main corridors.
In 1991, Trondheim implemented electronic urban tolling in the main corridors.
In 1991, the Athens Airport charged a 25% higher landing fee for those aircraft arriving between 11:00 and 17:00 during the high tourism season during summer.
Since 1992 congestion prices have been applied on Autoroute A1 in Northern France during weekends.
In 1995, California's private toll 91 Express Lanes, in Orange County was the first practical implementation of high-occupancy toll lanes (HOT).
Since 1995, 11 bills have been presented in the city council to introduce congestion pricing
In 1996, Interstate 15 in San Diego was implemented.
Since 1996, road space rationing by the last digit of the license plate has been in force in Sao Paulo
Singapore refined its initial congestion pricing system in 1998.
TfL reported an overall reduction of 11% in vehicle kilometres in London between 2000 and 2012 as a result of the charging scheme
In March 2001, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) implemented a discount on regular toll fees during off-peak hours for vehicles paying electronically with an E-ZPass issued in New York State.
In 2001, Norwegian Parliament approved legislation to implement congestion charges in cities
In 2001, Rome implemented a congestion pricing scheme.
In October 2002, Durham introduced congestion charges, reducing vehicle traffic significantly.
In 2002 Edinburgh, United Kingdom, initiated an implementation process for congestion pricing.
A 2020 study of London found that congestion pricing (introduced in 2003) led to reductions in pollution and reductions in driving, but it increased pollution from diesel vehicles (which were exempt from the congestion pricing).
In 2003, London implemented a congestion pricing scheme.
In 2003, testimony to the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee summarized the transport economics rationale for implementing congestion pricing on roads.
Between 2004 and 2005, Santiago de Chile implemented the first 100% non-stop urban toll for a freeway passing through a downtown area, charging by the distance traveled.
Between 2004 and 2005, Santiago de Chile implemented the first 100% non-stop urban toll for a freeway passing through a downtown area, charging by the distance traveled.
In 2005, a referendum in Edinburgh rejected the congestion pricing proposal.
In August 2006, the highest toll for high priority passage paid through the Transit Slot Auction was US$220,300 charged on a tanker, bypassing a 90-ship queue awaiting the end of maintenance works on the Gatun locks, thus avoiding a seven-day delay.
From December 2006 to April 2007, Singapore's LTA, along with IBM, ran a pilot with a traffic estimation and prediction tool (TrEPS).
A 2019 study of congestion pricing in Stockholm between 2006 and 2010 found that, in the absence of congestion pricing, Stockholm's air would have been 5 to 15 percent more polluted between 2006 and 2010, and that young children would have suffered substantially more asthma attacks.
In 2006, San Francisco transport authorities began a feasibility study to evaluate the introduction of congestion pricing.
In 2006, Stockholm implemented a seven-month congestion pricing trial.
In 2006, the last year before the zone was expanded, TfL observed that traffic flows were lower than in any recent year, while network traffic speeds were also lower than in any recent year.
Since 2006, ACP has available a 25th slot, sold through the Transit Slot Auction to the highest bidder.
since 2006 there has been an increase in road works by utilities and general development activity
From December 2006 to April 2007, Singapore's LTA, along with IBM, ran a pilot with a traffic estimation and prediction tool (TrEPS).
In August 2007, the United States Department of Transportation selected five metropolitan areas to initiate congestion pricing demonstration projects under the Urban Partnerships Congestion Initiative.
Congestion tax was introduced permanently in 2007.
Following the 2007 extension of London's congestion charge, reports varied with some indicating that business activity within the charge zone had been higher in both productivity and profitability and that the charge had a "broadly neutral impact" on the London wide economy, while others claiming an average drop in business of 25%.
In 2007, London's congestion pricing zone was extended.
In 2007, New York City shelved a proposal for a three-year pilot program for implementation in Manhattan.
In 2007, the Western Extension was established for the congestion charging zone.
In 2007, work started on the expansion of the Panama Canal through a new third set of locks.
Since 2007, congestion pricing has been used during rush hours in Santiago de Chile to maintain reasonable speeds within the city core.
In January 2008, Milan began a one-year trial program called Ecopass, charging low emission vehicles and exempting cleaner ones.
Since March 2008, qualified low-emission automobiles with a fuel economy of at least 45 miles per gallon are eligible to receive a Port Authority Green Pass, which allows for a 50% discount during off-peak hours.
In July 2008, London's Mayor Boris Johnson announced that the new CO2 charging structure would no longer be implemented.
In October 2008, London's Mayor Boris Johnson announced that the new CO2 charging structure would no longer be implemented.
In December 2008, initial congestion pricing scenarios were presented in public meetings in San Francisco.
On 12 December 2008, the Greater Manchester congestion scheme was overwhelmingly rejected by a public referendum.
In 2008, New York City left the Urban Partnerships Congestion Initiative and was replaced by Metro ExpressLanes in Los Angeles County.
In 2008, a new congestion pricing proposition in New York City was denied, and potential federal grants were reallocated.
In 2008, councils from across the West Midlands in the United Kingdom rejected congestion pricing schemes.
In January 2009, variable tolls were implemented at Sydney Harbour Bridge, two weeks after upgrading to 100% free-flow electronic toll collection, making it Australia's first road congestion pricing scheme.
According to the Bay Area Toll Authority, commute delays in the first six months of 2010 have dropped by an average of 15 percent compared with 2009 after the congestion tolls implementation
The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) estimated that the canal would reach its maximum sustainable capacity between 2009 and 2012.
In July 2010, congestion tolls were implemented at the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, charging US$6 during peak hours and US$5 on weekends.
In November 2010, the final results of San Francisco's congestion pricing study were announced, proposing modified alternatives.
A 2019 study of congestion pricing in Stockholm between 2006 and 2010 found that, in the absence of congestion pricing, Stockholm's air would have been 5 to 15 percent more polluted between 2006 and 2010, and that young children would have suffered substantially more asthma attacks.
In 2010, congestion pricing was initially proposed in Beijing and recommended by the World Bank. A similar scheme was proposed for Guangzhou, with a public discussion revealing strong opposition to the charges.
Starting with Trondheim in 2010, later in Kristiansand, Bergen and Oslo, time differing fees were introduced.
On January 4, 2011, London removed the 2007 Western Extension from the congestion charging zone, increased the basic charge to £10, and introduced an automated payment system.
In September 2011, local officials in Beijing announced plans to introduce congestion pricing. No details were provided regarding the magnitude of the charges or the charge zone.
In October 2011, the Norwegian government announced the introduction of rules allowing congestion charging in cities to cut emissions and relieve traffic.
In 2011, a vehicle quota system was introduced in Beijing, awarding new car licenses through a lottery.
On December 31, 2011, the Ecopass program in Milan ended.
In January 2012, Brazil's federal government enacted the Urban Mobility Law, authorizing municipalities to implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic flows and encourage public transportation.
On January 16, 2012, Milan replaced the Ecopass program with Area C, converting the scheme from a pollution charge to a congestion charge.
In April 2012, a São Paulo city council committee approved a bill to introduce congestion pricing within the existing road space rationing area.
In November 2012, São Paulo's strategic urban development plan "SP 2040" proposed the implementation of congestion pricing by 2025, contingent on metro and bus corridor density.
In November 2012, Transport for London (TfL) presented a proposal to abolish the Greener Vehicle Discount.
According to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, by 2012 there were in the United States 722 corridor-miles of HOV lanes, 294 corridor-miles of HOT/Express lanes and 163 corridor-miles of HOT/Express lanes under construction.
TfL reported an overall reduction of 11% in vehicle kilometres in London between 2000 and 2012 as a result of the charging scheme
The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) estimated that the canal would reach its maximum sustainable capacity between 2009 and 2012.
On January 1, 2013, the exemption for hybrid electric and bi-fuel natural gas vehicles (CNG and LPG) was originally set to expire.
In January 2013, the Gothenburg congestion tax was implemented, modeled after the Stockholm scheme.
In March 2013, the Area C scheme in Milan was made permanent, with net earnings invested in sustainable mobility.
In April 2013, the Urban Mobility Law enacted by Brazil went into effect, authorizing congestion pricing and promoting public transportation.
On July 1, 2013, the Ultra Low Emission Discount (ULED) went into effect, limiting free access to the congestion charge zone to selected vehicles.
A 2013 study found that after congestion pricing was implemented in Seattle, drivers reported greater satisfaction with the routes covered by congestion pricing and reported lower stress.
According to city's motor vehicle emission control plan 2013, the congestion charge will be a real-time variable pricing scheme based on actual traffic flows and emissions data, and allow the fee to be charged for different vehicles and varying by time of the day and for different districts.
In 2013, ten years since its implementation, TfL reported that the congestion charging scheme resulted in a 10% reduction in traffic volumes from baseline conditions.
As of November 2015, Norwegian authorities have implemented urban charging schemes in five additional cities or municipalities: Haugesund, Kristiansand, Namsos, Stavanger, and Tønsberg.
In December 2015, the Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport announced plans to introduce congestion charges in 2016. The charge will be a real-time variable pricing scheme based on traffic flows and emissions data.
An updated proposal calls for implementing a six-month to one-year congestion pricing trial in San Francisco in 2015.
On 1 January 2016, congestion taxes were increased in the inner-city parts of Stockholm, and also the congestion tax was introduced on Essingeleden motorway.
In May 2016, the Beijing city legislature announced it will consider starting to levy traffic congestion charges by 2020 as part of a package of measures to reform the vehicle quota system.
In June 2016, the expanded Panama Canal entered commercial operation, featuring new locks to allow transit of larger, Post-Panamax ships.
As of June 2016, Beijing's environmental and transport departments are collaborating on a congestion pricing proposal.
In 2016, a study found that more people used public transportation due to increases in congestion pricing in Singapore, and another study found that real estate prices dropped by 19% within the cordoned-off areas of Singapore where congestion pricing was in place relative to the areas outside of the area.
On December 31, 2016, Exemption has been postponed.
In October 2017, London introduced a new toxicity charge, known as T-charge, for older and more polluting vehicles.
In 2017, Governor Andrew Cuomo reintroduced a congestion pricing proposal for New York City.
In 2017, the vehicle quota system was introduced in 2011, awarding new car licenses through a lottery, with a ceiling of 6 million units set by the city authority.
In March 2019, Cuomo's congestion pricing plan for New York City was approved.
On April 8, 2019, the T-charge in London was expanded into the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ).
A 2019 study of congestion pricing in Stockholm between 2006 and 2010 found that, in the absence of congestion pricing, Stockholm's air would have been 5 to 15 percent more polluted between 2006 and 2010, and that young children would have suffered substantially more asthma attacks.
Interstate 66 in the Washington, D.C., metro area, average, round trip prices are $11.88 in 2019
A 2020 study that analyzed driving restrictions in Beijing estimated that the implementation of congestion pricing would reduce total traffic, increase traffic speed, reduce pollution, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce traffic accidents, and increase tax revenues.
In 2020, the price is typically NOK 28 (€2.37) per passage, but to enter Oslo to the inner city and leave means passing five stations which costs NOK 126 (€10,66).
In May 2016, the Beijing city legislature announced it will consider starting to levy traffic congestion charges by 2020 as part of a package of measures to reform the vehicle quota system.
Interstate 66 in the Washington, D.C., metro area, average, round trip prices are $5.04 in 2020
A 2021 study found that congestion pricing reduced CO2 emissions through downsizing commuting distances and housing sizes.
Interstate 66 in the Washington, D.C., metro area, average, round trip prices are $4.75 in 2021
congestion pricing in New York City would not go into effect until 2022 at the earliest
In May 2023, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) finalized and published the Environmental Assessment (EA) of the congestion program, initiating a 30-day public comment period.
On June 12, 2023, the 30-day public comment period for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) Environmental Assessment (EA) of the congestion program concluded.
On June 22, 2023, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published its Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) decision for the congestion pricing project, determining that the Environmental Assessment (EA) adequately addressed public input, considered the impacts, and mitigated adverse effects.
On June 26, 2023, the Federal Highway Administration gave its final approval, allowing the MTA to begin setting toll rates for the proposed congestion zone.
On June 5, 2024, Governor Kathy Hochul announced the congestion pricing plan was indefinitely postponed.
In October 2024, Thailand's Ministry of Transport announced plans for a 40-50 Baht congestion charge for motorists entering inner Bangkok, with funds subsidizing railway fares.
In November 2024, Hochul announced an intent for the toll to go forward with a planned implementation on 5 January 2025, at a reduced rate.
Hochul announced an intent for the toll to go forward with a planned implementation on 5 January 2025, at a reduced rate.
Congestion pricing in New York City was implemented in 2025, charging most vehicles entering Manhattan south of 60th Street.
In November 2012, São Paulo's strategic urban development plan "SP 2040" proposed the implementation of congestion pricing by 2025, contingent on metro and bus corridor density.
In November 2012, São Paulo's strategic urban development plan "SP 2040" proposed the implementation of congestion pricing by 2025, contingent on metro and bus corridor density.
The Environmental Assessment (EA) data for a 2045 projection projected a 10.4% reduction in crossings from Brooklyn to the congestion zone which includes the BQE (Brooklyn-Queens Expressway) and other connected entryways such as the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridge.
California is the most populous US state located on the...
Boris Johnson is a British politician and writer who served...
Washington D C the capital of the United States is...
Hong Kong is a densely populated special administrative region of...
San Francisco is a major commercial financial and cultural hub...
Australia officially the Commonwealth of Australia encompasses the Australian mainland...
Sacha Boey is a French professional footballer Primarily a right-back he currently plays for Bayern Munich in the Bundesliga Boey...
2 days ago Mark Green's departure triggers free-for-all in Tennessee's 7th congressional district race.
14 days ago England vs India Test: Crawley stars, Stokes rebounds after Gill-Pant partnership.
15 days ago Sleep Token Dominates Download Festival 2025, Silencing Naysayers and Captivating Fans.
8 days ago Iga Swiatek's Wimbledon Draw Revealed: Potential Gauff Clash, Sabalenka's Unfavorable Path
Zeynep S nmez is a Turkish professional tennis player She has achieved career-high WTA rankings of No in singles and...
Jupiter is the fifth and largest planet from the Sun...
Candace Owens is an American conservative and far-right political commentator...
A blue moon is defined in several ways most commonly...
Thom Tillis is the senior U S Senator from North...
KPop Demon Hunters is a animated musical fantasy action comedy...
Starbucks is an American multinational coffeehouse chain established in Seattle...