Stephen Gerald Breyer was an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1994 to 2022, appointed by President Bill Clinton. Known for his liberal stance, he succeeded Justice Harry Blackmun. Following his retirement, Breyer assumed the role of Byrne Professor of Administrative Law and Process at Harvard Law School.
On August 15, 1938, Stephen Gerald Breyer was born.
Stephen Breyer graduated high school in 1955.
Stephen Breyer graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree with highest honors and membership in Phi Beta Kappa from Stanford University in 1959.
As a Marshall Scholar, Stephen Breyer studied philosophy, politics, and economics at Magdalen College, Oxford, receiving a first-class honors B.A. in 1961.
From 1964 to 1965, Stephen Breyer served as a law clerk to U.S. Supreme Court justice Arthur Goldberg.
Stephen Breyer graduated from Harvard Law School magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1964. While attending, he was an articles editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Stephen Breyer graduates from Harvard Law School in 1964 and clerks for Associate Justice Arthur Goldberg.
Following his clerkship, Stephen Breyer worked briefly as a fact-checker for the Warren Commission and then as a special assistant to the Assistant Attorney General in the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division.
In 1965, Stephen Breyer was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve, where he reached the rank of corporal.
Stephen Breyer begins teaching at Harvard Law School in 1967, specializing in administrative law and writing textbooks.
Stephen Breyer married The Honourable Joanna Freda Hare, a psychologist and member of the British aristocracy, in 1967.
Stephen Breyer returned to Harvard Law School in 1967 as an assistant professor, teaching there until 1980.
In 1970, Stephen Breyer authored "The Uneasy Case for Copyright," a widely cited skeptical examination of copyright.
During 1973, Stephen Breyer took a leave of absence from teaching to serve as assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.
In 1973, Stephen Breyer took a leave of absence from teaching to work as an assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.
Starting in 1974, Stephen Breyer served as a special counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary until 1975.
Stephen Breyer concluded his service as special counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1975.
While still teaching at Harvard Law School, Stephen Breyer took on a joint appointment at Harvard Kennedy School, where he worked from 1977 to 1980.
From 1979 to 1980, Stephen Breyer served as chief counsel of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. During this time, he worked with the committee's chairman, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, to pass the Airline Deregulation Act.
On February 20, 1980, Richard S. Arnold was confirmed by the Senate to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, nominated by President Jimmy Carter.
On November 13, 1980, after losing his bid for reelection, President Jimmy Carter nominated Stephen Breyer to the First Circuit.
The U.S. Senate confirmed Stephen Breyer's nomination to the First Circuit on December 9, 1980, by a vote of 80–10.
Stephen Breyer received his commission on December 10, 1980.
Stephen Breyer begins serving as a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit starting in 1980.
Stephen Breyer concluded his time teaching at Harvard Law School in 1980.
In 1980, Stephen Breyer finished his service as chief counsel of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
Stephen Breyer served on the United States Sentencing Commission from 1985 to 1989.
Bruce Babbitt ran for president in 1988.
Stephen Breyer concluded his service on the United States Sentencing Commission in 1989.
From 1990 to 1994, Stephen Breyer served on the Judicial Conference of the United States.
Richard S. Arnold served as chief judge and a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States until 1990.
Stephen Breyer became the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in 1990, a role he held until 1994.
President Bill Clinton considered both Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg for the Supreme Court seat vacated by Byron White in 1993. He ultimately appointed Ginsburg.
Despite initial reservations, on May 17, 1994, President Clinton nominated Stephen Breyer as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, influenced by Senators Ted Kennedy and Tom Harkin.
On July 29, 1994, the Senate confirmed Stephen Breyer as an associate justice by a vote of 87 to 9.
When Harry Blackmun retired from the Supreme Court in 1994, President Clinton considered Stephen Breyer for the vacancy.
Stephen Breyer concluded his service on the Judicial Conference of the United States in 1994.
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994, which Breyer later dissented against aspects of in Golan v. Holder, was enacted.
Stephen Breyer served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit until 1994.
Since 1994, Justice Breyer consistently demonstrated his judicial philosophy, marked by strong support for abortion rights, deference to Congress in overturning legislation, and a belief in the persuasive value of foreign and international law in court decisions.
In 1994, Stephen Breyer was nominated by President Bill Clinton to serve as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, replacing retiring justice Harry Blackmun.
Justice Antonin Scalia's 1997 book, "A Matter of Interpretation," advocated for an originalist approach to interpreting legal texts, emphasizing the original meaning of the words. This book prompted Breyer's response in "Active Liberty."
In 2000, Breyer sided with the majority in Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., granting standing to individuals affected by pollution to sue industrial polluters.
In 2000, Breyer wrote the majority opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart, which struck down a Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion.
Bill Clinton's presidency concluded in January 2001.
On January 15, 2003, Breyer dissented in Eldred v. Ashcroft, arguing that the retroactive extension of copyright protection granted by the Copyright Term Extension Act effectively amounted to perpetual copyright, violating the Copyright Clause and First Amendment. He argued the extension would stifle creativity and harm education.
On April 28, 2004, Justice Breyer dissented in Vieth v. Jubelirer, a case concerning partisan gerrymandering. Breyer argued that while not all gerrymandering is unconstitutional, courts can intervene when it undermines democratic principles and causes harm.
Stephen Breyer was honored with election to the American Philosophical Society in 2004.
In 2005, Justice Breyer published "Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution," outlining his approach to interpreting legal texts. He emphasizes considering the text's purpose and the real-world consequences of rulings, contrasting with Justice Scalia's focus on original meaning.
In 2005, Stephen Breyer published "Active Liberty," a book sharing his views on legal theory and the role of the judiciary.
In 2005, while joining the unanimous court in MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Breyer wrote a concurrence arguing that peer-to-peer file-sharing companies could be protected under the Sony doctrine without evidence of inducement.
In March 2006, at the New York Historical Society, Justice Breyer discussed the role of democracy in achieving social justice. He argued that while democracy is essential, it doesn't always guarantee equality and fairness, highlighting the importance of legal protections like universal suffrage in advancing civil rights.
In 2006, Justice Breyer was part of a 5-4 majority that struck down a Texas redistricting plan for violating the Voting Rights Act. He found that the plan diluted minority voting strength, demonstrating his commitment to fair electoral practices.
In 2007, Stephen Breyer received the Distinguished Eagle Scout Award from the Boy Scouts of America.
During an appearance on Fox News Sunday on December 12, 2010, Stephen Breyer voiced his stance on gun regulation. He asserted that the Founding Fathers, based on historical context and values, didn't intend for unregulated guns, supporting his dissenting view in the District of Columbia v. Heller case.
Since its passage in 2010, Justice Breyer consistently voted to uphold the Affordable Care Act, demonstrating his support for the legislation's aims and provisions.
In 2010, Stephen Breyer authored his second book, "Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View," where he delves into the tools judges utilize to interpret legal provisions. He contrasts his pragmatic approach, emphasizing "purpose" and "consequences," with the textualist view favored by justices like Scalia.
Following the controversy surrounding Justice Samuel Alito's reaction to President Barack Obama's criticism of the Supreme Court's Citizens United v. FEC ruling during the 2010 State of the Union address, Stephen Breyer publicly stated his intention to continue attending the address.
In 2011, Justice Breyer sided with the majority in Hollyfrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Association, ruling in favor of oil refineries. The court found that refineries experiencing financial hardship didn't require annual exemptions from federal renewable fuels policy since 2011 to qualify for an exemption.
Breyer expressed similar concerns regarding copyright in his 2012 dissent in Golan v. Holder, which upheld the Uruguay Round Agreements Act's copyright provisions.
On June 25, 2014, Breyer delivered the majority opinion in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., ruling that Aereo's streaming service violated copyright law as it closely resembled cable operations.
In 2015, Breyer dissented in Glossip v. Gross, questioning the constitutionality of the death penalty itself. He argued that it was "highly likely" that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment.
In 2015, Breyer faced scrutiny for participating in a case involving Johnson Controls after his wife sold stock in the company. Although he came back into compliance, the incident raised concerns.
Stephen Breyer published his third book, "The Court and the World: American Law and the New Global Realities," in 2015. This work explores the intersection of U.S. and international law, advocating for the consideration of global realities in U.S. legal cases.
Stephen Breyer took on the role of chair of the Pritzker Architecture Prize jury in 2018, succeeding Glenn Murcutt.
Justice Breyer continued his stance against partisan gerrymandering in June 2019, dissenting in Rucho v. Common Cause. The court ruled 5-4 that gerrymandering claims were beyond the reach of federal courts, a decision Breyer disagreed with.
In 2019, Breyer joined the 5-4 majority in Department of Commerce v. New York, ruling against the inclusion of a citizenship question on the census due to procedural errors. He also held the question itself as unconstitutional.
On April 23, 2020, Breyer authored the majority opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, ruling that the County of Maui needed a permit for releasing groundwater pollution into the ocean under the Clean Water Act. This decision was considered a win for environmental protection.
On June 29, 2020, Breyer authored the plurality opinion in June Medical Services v. Russo, striking down a Louisiana abortion law requiring doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. He reaffirmed the "benefits and burdens" test from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
In July 2020, Breyer reiterated his stance on the death penalty, suggesting that it might violate the Constitution and calling for further examination of the issue.
On July 31, 2020, Justice Breyer dissented in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision that allowed the construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall to proceed. Breyer argued that the wall's environmental impact, particularly on wildlife and water flow in the Sonoran Desert, warranted halting its construction. He expressed concern that allowing construction to continue could prejudice the case's final outcome.
On December 18, 2020, Breyer dissented in Trump v. New York, arguing against the Court's decision to sidestep the case concerning the exclusion of undocumented immigrants from the census. He believed the Court should have ruled in favor of the challengers.
Following the 2020 elections, progressive activists and Democratic lawmakers began urging Justice Breyer to retire, hoping to create a vacancy for President Biden to fill with a younger liberal justice.
On March 4, 2021, Justice Breyer dissented in the case of United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. Sierra Club, Inc. The case centered on the Sierra Club's request for access to government documents related to environmental regulations. Breyer argued that the public's right to access such information outweighed the government's interest in keeping the documents confidential.
On April 5, 2021, Breyer authored the majority opinion in Google v. Oracle, finding that Google's copying of Java declaring code constituted fair use, as it was essential for interoperability and did not significantly harm Oracle's market.
On June 17, 2021, Justice Breyer authored the majority opinion in California v. Texas, a 7-2 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate. Breyer argued that the states challenging the mandate lacked standing to sue, emphasizing the need for demonstrable harm caused by a law's enforcement.
In August 2021, amidst calls for his retirement, Justice Breyer expressed his desire to retire before his death in a New York Times interview. He acknowledged the significance of his successor's potential impact on the court's direction.
Stephen Breyer appeared as a guest on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in September 2021. During his appearance, he engaged in discussions about the Texas Heartbeat Act and addressed his stance on retirement.
In September 2021, Stephen Breyer participated in an interview on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS. He fielded questions regarding his retirement plans and took the opportunity to promote his book, "The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics."
During a September 2021 interview, Justice Breyer reiterated his position on retirement, stating that while he acknowledged the opinions of those urging him to step down, he would base his decision on various factors and would not remain on the court indefinitely.
Throughout 2021, Justice Breyer consistently dissented in significant voting rights and election cases. He disagreed with the majority's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. He also dissented in cases related to voting deadlines during the COVID-19 pandemic and Arizona's voting restrictions, demonstrating his commitment to protecting voting access.
As the 2021-2022 term commenced, it marked the final year of Justice Breyer's tenure on the Supreme Court, culminating in his retirement announcement.
On January 27, 2022, alongside President Joe Biden, Stephen Breyer publicly announced his intention to retire from the Supreme Court.
President Biden nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and a former law clerk for Breyer, to succeed Breyer on the Supreme Court on February 25, 2022.
On April 7, 2022, the Senate voted 53–47 to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.
Stephen Breyer remained on the Supreme Court until June 30, 2022.
In 2022, Breyer dissented in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade.
Stephen Breyer retired from his position as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022. He became affiliated with Harvard Law School as the Byrne Professor of Administrative Law and Process.
On March 26, 2024, Stephen Breyer released his fourth book, "Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism." In conjunction with the release, he participated in an interview where he critiqued textualism, a judicial philosophy favored by conservative justices, arguing its limitations in achieving the goals of those who crafted legal statutes and the Constitution.